Australia shows how to create a 21st Century Network

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has created a public private partnership to sort out the country's poor broadband network.

The programme aims to link 90 per cent of Aussie homes, schools and businesses with speeds of up to 100 Mbps - true FTTH. The remaining ten per cent of premises will get wireless or satellite links with speeds of up to 12 Mbps

The government is establishing a company to build the fibre network which it expects to cost $43bn (£20.8bn) and take eight years to complete. It will provide jobs for 25,000 people a year on average.

The government will be the majority shareholder, but intends to sell its stake within five years of the network being completed. The cash will come from the sale of consumer Aussie Investment Bonds (AIBs) and funds from the Building Australia Fund.

Rudd said slow broadband was holding Australia back. He compared a decent fibre network with the railway networks of the 19th century.

He reckons the project is Australia's largest ever "nation-building infrastructure project". Rudd had asked for private sector bids for the work but none were considered viable.

The first step will be negotiating with Tasmania which could start its fibre to the premises network as early as July. New builds will be required to provide fibre from July 2010.

Alongside this huge investment Rudd promised wholesale telecoms reform - the public has until 3 June to make its suggestions for changes.

Australia has always suffered from slow and expensive broadband for years.  Some of this can be blamed on geography, although the incumbent telco, Telstra, is also culpable..

However, if Gordon Brown is serious about providing Britain with a 21^st Century infrastructure he should start talking to Rudd.  Guaranteeing that everyone will have access to 1.5Mbps is just pathetic and we will continue to languish in the bottom division of broadband access.   In a previous article I referred to the developments of Fibrecity projects by i3 Group Ltd.  These guys deserve massive support to roll out the planned 15 locations as quickly as possible.

We need to join the Ethernet club now and get full FTTH to every home in the country and stop relying on the whining of BT experimenting with some 40Mbps service options.  It just will not do.  The UK needs an integrated national fibre infrastructure not some half baked commitment to ADSL access and the cost  of full FTTH would far less than saving a single fat cat bank, have lasting value and create thousands of jobs.

UK ISP, Cable and Dongle User Numbers - April 2009

Here is an update of the UK ISP market covering DSL and Cable Access market as well as the Mobile Dongle market in the UK. I have used ITU published data for Broadband usage numbers and Neilson Ratings and ISP published figures to get an accurate picture as well all the reports and disclosures for each of the companies shown below. I believe these figures represent a reasonably accurate representation of the genuine adoption of broadband either via DSL, Cable or mobile dongle. Broadband connections included in this data cover download speeds equal to or faster than 256kbit/s.

ISP      Total    % of   UK Accts. BT (inc Plusnet) 4,700,000 26.05% Virgin Media (inc Virgin.net) 3,934,800 21.80% CPW (inc AOL) 2,700,000 14.96% Sky 1,955,000 10.83% Tiscali UK 1,768,000 9.80% Orange 1,000,000 5.54% Royal Mail 560,000 3.10% O2 (Be & Dongles) 340,866 1.89% 3 (Mobile Dongles) 255,000 1.42% Kingston 203,000 1.12% T-Mobile (Dongle) 161,000 0.89% Vodafone (Dongle) 132,000 0.73% Thus 126,000 0.66% Entanet 92,000 0.51% Clara.net UK 72,000 0.40% Breathe 12,000 0.07% Supanet 6,000 0.03% Others 28,000 0.16% Total 18,045,666 100.00%

 

The UK market exceeded 18 million broadband connections for the first time with all the growth being shown by the dongle market.  Both Tiscali and Orange again reported lower figures and still no news on the Tiscali sell-off.  The new battle ground for users appears to be shifting to the FTTH (fibre to the home) and FTTB (fibre to the building).  BT announced their high speed initiative targeting 29 areas with their 40 Mbps offering.  Virgin complained that many of the areas targeted were already served by their 50Mbps service.

An interesting development is the planned development of local authority run “ISPs” planned on the back of i3 Group Ltd (formerly H20Networks) in Dundee and Bournemouth who could be offering Ethernet interconnectivity to the home of a fully duplex 100Mbps 55,000 and 88,000 homes respectively. Whether these locally run ISPs ever emerge is an interesting thought since it will lead local councils into the tricky area of service provision and possible political control of services delivered or “surfed” for by their customers.